Janet E. Carpenter

820 citations
14 papers · 608 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Carpenter

13 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

Janet E. Carpenter
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 124
  • Plant Science 478
  • Biotechnology 63
  • Insect Science 84
  • Molecular Biology 339
Replace Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen with:
Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen Brazil
Clive James United States
Alma Piñeyro‐Nelson Mexico
Jonas Kathage Spain
Olivier Sanvido Switzerland
Marco Cristancho Colombia
G. J. Persley Australia
Koen Dillen Belgium
Pascal Tillie Spain
Bernadette Oehen Switzerland
Janet E. Carpenter relative to Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen Brazil Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Carpenter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Carpenter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Carpenter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Carpenter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Carpenter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Carpenter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Carpenter. The network helps show where Janet E. Carpenter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Carpenter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Carpenter Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Carpenter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2010225
2
Herbicide tolerant soybeans: why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties
1999109
3 2011102
4 200148
5 200328
6 200120
7 200118
8 200017
9 201314
10
A review and assessment of 'Impact of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the US - the first sixteen years: Benbrook C (2012)' -Environmental Sciences Europe vol 24: 24 (September 2012)
201211
11
Comparing Roundup Ready and Conventional Soybean Yields 1999
20019
12 20036
13 20031
14 20160

About Janet E. Carpenter

Janet E. Carpenter is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Soil Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (10 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (2 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (2 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (2 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (1 paper) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (124 citations), Plant Science (478 citations), Biotechnology (63 citations), Insect Science (84 citations) and Molecular Biology (339 citations). Janet E. Carpenter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Leonard Gianessi and Lori Lynch. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Nature Biotechnology, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, BioScience and California Agriculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact