Clive James

1.1k citations
14 papers · 835 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Clive James

14 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers

Clive James
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Plant Science 647
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116
  • Biotechnology 107
  • Insect Science 122
  • Business and International Management 18
Replace G. J. Persley with:
G. J. Persley Netherlands
Drew L. Kershen United States
Agnès Ricroch France
Dennis Eriksson Sweden
Yann Devos Italy
José Benjamin Falck‐Zepeda United States
Yousouf Ismael United Kingdom
Peter Barfoot United Kingdom
Alessandro Nicolia Italy
Jeremy Sweet France
Clive James relative to G. J. Persley Netherlands G. J. Persley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
G. J. Persley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clive James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive James. The network helps show where Clive James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Clive James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clive James Line = papers co-authored together Clive James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Global review of commercialized transgenic crops
2003337
2
ISAAA Briefs brief 41 Global status of Commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2009
2009268
3
Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2001 Feature: Bt Cotton
2002101
4 201073
5
Agricultural research and development : the needs for public-private sector partnerships
199613
6
Role of the private sector.
19909
7 20017
8 20007
9 20006
10
The First Decade of Crop Biotechnology
19965
11 19933
12
The cost of disease to world agriculture [Nineteenth International Seed Testing Congress 1980].
19803
13 20082
14 20091

About Clive James

Clive James is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biotechnology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (11 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (6 papers), Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (2 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (2 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper) and Biotechnology and Related Fields (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (647 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (116 citations), Biotechnology (107 citations), Insect Science (122 citations) and Business and International Management (18 citations). Clive James has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Cayman Islands. Frequent co-authors include G. J. Persley, A. Krattiger and David W. Altman. Their work appears in journals such as Current Science, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Journal of Biotechnology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Seed Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact