Janet Cooley

27 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Janet Cooley
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 107
  • Family Practice 13
  • General Health Professions 136
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 150
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Matthew Lacroix with:
Matthew Lacroix United States
Patricia L. Darbishire United States
Mitra Assemi United States
Debra Copeland United States
Jennifer Danielson United States
Liza Seubert Australia
David R. Steeb United States
Cynthia J. Boyle United States
Jeffrey N. Baldwin United States
O. Catala France
Janet Cooley relative to Matthew Lacroix United States Matthew Lacroix's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Matthew Lacroix · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Cooley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Cooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Cooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Cooley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Cooley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Cooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Cooley. The network helps show where Janet Cooley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Cooley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Cooley Line = papers co-authored together Janet Cooley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202146
2 201830
3 201728
4 201421
5 201820
6 201318
7 202015
8 201514
9 201914
10 201713
11 201512
12 20159
13 20138
14 20158
15 20187
16 20226
17 20196
18 20206
19 20234
20 20174

About Janet Cooley

Janet Cooley is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Education and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 32 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (21 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (107 citations), Family Practice (13 citations), General Health Professions (136 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (150 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Janet Cooley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeannie K. Lee, Suzanne Larson, Marion Slack, Terri Warholak, Maryam T. Fazel, Ann M. Taylor, Helen M. Amerongen, Lisa W. Goldstone, Richard N. Herrier and Sandipan Bhattacharjee. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Seminars in Oncology Nursing and Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact