Translation and Literature

276 papers and 300 indexed citations i.

About

The 276 papers published in Translation and Literature in the last decades have received a total of 300 indexed citations. Papers published in Translation and Literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (72 papers), Language and Linguistics (64 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (44 papers) specifically the topics of Translation Studies and Practices (44 papers), Medieval Literature and History (20 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Translation and Literature are Christopher Whyte, Anthony Pym, Stuart Gillespie, Douglas Robinson, Jacob Blakesley, Christopher H. Johnson, Théo Hermans, Francis R. Jones, Robert Cummings and Jeremy Munday.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Translation and Literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Translation and Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Translation and Literature.

Countries where authors publish in Translation and Literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Translation and Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Translation and Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Translation and Literature more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025