Jane Sixsmith

1.8k citations
50 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

    • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
    • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
    • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health top 5%
    • Social Media in Health Education

Papers in

Jane Sixsmith

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jane Sixsmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • General Health Professions 426
  • Health 125
  • Communication 57
  • Speech and Hearing 46
  • Research and Theory 5
Replace Shelly Campo with:
Shelly Campo United States
Emma Hughes Australia
Jennie Naidoo United Kingdom
Elizabeth Carlson United States
Paula Louise Bush Canada
Judith M. Ottoson United States
Dawn C. Bucholtz United States
Joseph G. L. Lee United States
Carolyn M. Porta United States
Renate Kahlke Canada
Jane Sixsmith relative to Shelly Campo United States Shelly Campo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Shelly Campo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Sixsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Sixsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Sixsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Sixsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Sixsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Sixsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Sixsmith. The network helps show where Jane Sixsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Sixsmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Sixsmith Line = papers co-authored together Jane Sixsmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013172
2 201198
3 200676
4 200771
5 201753
6 201353
7 201349
8 200643
9 201942
10 201740
11 201539
12 201537
13 202134
14 200432
15 201225
16 201924
17 201816
18 202016
19 202016
20 201415

About Jane Sixsmith

Jane Sixsmith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Education and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (17 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers), Social Media in Health Education (8 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (7 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (4 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (3 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (426 citations), Health (125 citations), Communication (57 citations), Speech and Hearing (46 citations) and Research and Theory (5 citations). Jane Sixsmith has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Margaret M. Barry, Saoirse Nic Gabhainn, Dympna Tuohy, Maura Dowling, Kathy Murphy, Adeline Cooney, Maureen D’Eath, Christine Domegan, Andrea F. de Winter and Sijmen A. Reijneveld. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Health Education, BMJ Open, BMC Medical Education and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact