Maureen D’Eath

21 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Maureen D’Eath
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Physiology 167
  • General Health Professions 92
  • Speech and Hearing 24
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Health 27
Replace Steven S. Foldes with:
Steven S. Foldes United States
Bethany Hipple Walters Netherlands
Gulnur Freeman United States
Amanda Parsons United Kingdom
Wasantha Jayawardene United States
Michelle B. Stockton United States
Ragna Stalsberg Norway
Tuovi Hakulinen Finland
Lucia Maria Lotrean Romania
Fiona Morgan United Kingdom
Maureen D’Eath relative to Steven S. Foldes United States Steven S. Foldes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Steven S. Foldes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maureen D’Eath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maureen D’Eath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maureen D’Eath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maureen D’Eath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maureen D’Eath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maureen D’Eath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maureen D’Eath. The network helps show where Maureen D’Eath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maureen D’Eath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maureen D’Eath Line = papers co-authored together Maureen D’Eath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005179
2 201675
3 201347
4 200728
5 201323
6 201823
7 201223
8 201920
9 201319
10 201018
11 20178
12 20238
13 20246
14 20235
15 20235
16 20225
17 20184
18 20144
19 20143
20
An independent evaluation of the strengthening families programme in the WRDTF region.
20111

About Maureen D’Eath

Maureen D’Eath is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (167 citations), General Health Professions (92 citations), Speech and Hearing (24 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Health (27 citations). Maureen D’Eath has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jane Sixsmith, Gillian Paul, Margaret M. Barry, Willem de Grave, Tim Dornan, Peter Cantillon, Alan Kelly, Diarmuid O’Donovan, Lisa Pursell and Shane Allwright. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Nursing and Health Sciences and Sexuality & Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact