Jane Robertson

66 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Jane Robertson
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 134
  • Health Information Management 203
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 120
  • Family Practice 42
  • Toxicology 47
Replace John Marriott with:
John Marriott United Kingdom
Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol Brazil
T Walley United Kingdom
Lynne Emmerton Australia
Mareni Rocha Farías Brazil
Steven M. Ornstein United States
Daniel Erku Ethiopia
Shane Scahill New Zealand
Andy Husband United Kingdom
Adrianne C. Feldstein United States
Jane Robertson relative to John Marriott United Kingdom John Marriott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
John Marriott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Robertson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Robertson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Robertson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Robertson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Robertson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Robertson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Robertson. The network helps show where Jane Robertson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Robertson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Robertson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Robertson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995244
2 2010229
3 2009154
4 2011128
5 201991
6 201690
7 201572
8 200562
9 200961
10 201259
11 201056
12 202143
13 199842
14 201339
15 201938
16 201537
17 201537
18 199334
19 201934
20 201530

About Jane Robertson

Jane Robertson is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health Information Management, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Pharmacology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (17 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (134 citations), Health Information Management (203 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (120 citations), Family Practice (42 citations) and Toxicology (47 citations). Jane Robertson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Henry, David Newby, Sallie‐Anne Pearson, Margaret Williamson, Isla Hains, Emily Walkom, Annette Moxey, Dianne O’Connell, Ronald D. Barr and Philip Hazell. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, BMC Health Services Research, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice and BMJ Global Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact