Jane Reeves

28 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Jane Reeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • Public Administration 32
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57
  • Horticulture 4
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
Replace Michelle L. Kaiser with:
Michelle L. Kaiser United States
Mat Jones United Kingdom
Ruth Emond United Kingdom
Jiao Lü China
Breanna Wright Australia
Ashanté M. Reese United States
Richard Silburn United Kingdom
Nicklas Neuman Sweden
Danielle Venn Australia
Nicole Webster United States
Jane Reeves relative to Michelle L. Kaiser United States Michelle L. Kaiser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Michelle L. Kaiser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Reeves. The network helps show where Jane Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Reeves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Reeves Line = papers co-authored together Jane Reeves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002126
2 199968
3 200629
4 201520
5 201915
6 202015
7 200011
8 201710
9 199410
10 200710
11 201910
12 20157
13 20246
14 19996
15 20216
16
Focusing on young men: developing integrated services for young fathers.
20094
17 20104
18 19934
19
The ones left behind: the experiences of young mothers with partners in prison.
20113
20 20183

About Jane Reeves

Jane Reeves is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Education and Safety Research, having authored 29 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (4 papers), Research in Social Sciences (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Public Administration (32 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (57 citations), Horticulture (4 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations). Jane Reeves has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Julie Nightingale, M.R. Bellon, David Shemmings, Heather J. Ferguson, Sarah E. Dean, Beverly B. Koerin, Amy Burton, Denise Kendrick, Susan Denman and Kia J. Bentley. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse Review, Forum qualitative Sozialforschung, BMC Medical Research Methodology, Clinical Nutrition and European Journal of Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact