Sarah E. Dean
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Resilience and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Breastfeeding Practices and Influences 4
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 1
-
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 1
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 1
- Co-authors
- Amy Burton (6 shared papers)Gina Z. Koutsopoulou (1 shared paper)Siobhan Hugh‐Jones (1 shared paper)Claire L. Fox (1 shared paper)Rachel Povey (2 shared papers)Jane Reeves (1 shared paper)Stephen D. Edwards (1 shared paper)David J. Edwards (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Appetite (2 papers)Midwifery (1 paper)European Journal of Ageing (1 paper)Stress and Health (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Sarah E. Dean
11 papers receiving 393 citations
Sarah E. Dean's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Clinical Psychology 205
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
- General Health Professions 115
- Social Psychology 82
- Research and Theory 3
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Dean. The network helps show where Sarah E. Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How Effective are Mindfulness‐Based Interventions for Reducing Stress Among Healthcare Professionals? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 294 |
| 2 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 |
About Sarah E. Dean
Sarah E. Dean is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (4 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (205 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), General Health Professions (115 citations), Social Psychology (82 citations) and Research and Theory (3 citations). Sarah E. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Amy Burton, Gina Z. Koutsopoulou, Siobhan Hugh‐Jones, Claire L. Fox, Rachel Povey, Jane Reeves, Stephen D. Edwards, David J. Edwards, Douglas Carroll and Mike Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Midwifery, European Journal of Ageing, Stress and Health and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.