Jane Morgan‐Daniel

33 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Jane Morgan‐Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Conservation 54
  • Library and Information Sciences 15
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 27
  • Occupational Therapy 12
  • Social Psychology 53
Replace Alexandra Korotchenko with:
Alexandra Korotchenko Canada
Nicola Ann Plastow South Africa
Nicolas Kühne Switzerland
Miguel González Valeiro Spain
Meredith Flood United States
Kate Swaffer Australia
Louise McCabe United Kingdom
Beverly P. Horowitz United States
Kathleen Sullivan United States
Nishi Misra India
Jane Morgan‐Daniel relative to Alexandra Korotchenko Canada Alexandra Korotchenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alexandra Korotchenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Morgan‐Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Morgan‐Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Morgan‐Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Morgan‐Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Morgan‐Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Morgan‐Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Morgan‐Daniel. The network helps show where Jane Morgan‐Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Morgan‐Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Morgan‐Daniel Line = papers co-authored together Jane Morgan‐Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199244
2 202043
3 201931
4 202328
5 202023
6 202222
7 202016
8 202015
9 202112
10 201810
11 20199
12 20248
13 19937
14 20245
15 20215
16 20214
17 20174
18 20234
19 20213
20 20233

About Jane Morgan‐Daniel

Jane Morgan‐Daniel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Conservation, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 41 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (7 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers), Library Science and Administration (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (2 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (54 citations), Library and Information Sciences (15 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (27 citations), Occupational Therapy (12 citations) and Social Psychology (53 citations). Jane Morgan‐Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Lucia Zedner, Virginia Pesata, Jill Sonke, Michelle I. Cardel, Nancy Schaefer, Sandra Winter, Victoria Guazzelli Williamson, Sherrilene Classen, Alexandra Lee and Aaron Colverson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Frontiers in Public Health, Health Information & Libraries Journal and F1000Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact