Kate Swaffer

26 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Kate Swaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 120
  • General Health Professions 153
  • Conservation 12
  • Demography 38
Replace Lisa Loiselle with:
Lisa Loiselle Canada
Louise McCabe United Kingdom
Paulina Szymczyńska United Kingdom
Yvette G. Flores United States
Marja Saarenheimo Finland
Nicolas Kühne Switzerland
Jennifer Swindle Canada
Torunn Hamran Norway
Siri Ytrehus Norway
Esther Oi-wah Chow Hong Kong
Kate Swaffer relative to Lisa Loiselle Canada Lisa Loiselle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lisa Loiselle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Swaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Swaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Swaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Swaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Swaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Swaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Swaffer. The network helps show where Kate Swaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Swaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Swaffer Line = papers co-authored together Kate Swaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201674
2 201873
3 201947
4 201742
5
Human Rights and the Confinement of People Living with Dementia in Care Homes.
202027
6 201926
7 202025
8 201924
9 201923
10 202020
11 202118
12 202115
13 202210
14 20248
15 20216
16
Reparations for Harms Experienced in Residential Aged Care.
20224
17 20233
18 20243
19 20223
20 20222

About Kate Swaffer

Kate Swaffer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Demography, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (3 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations), General Health Professions (153 citations), Conservation (12 citations) and Demography (38 citations). Kate Swaffer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lyn Phillipson, Lee‐Fay Low, Henry Brodaty, Margaret McGrath, Linda Steele, Chris Brennan‐Horley, Elizabeth K. Cridland, Richard Fleming, Monica Cations and Kate Laver. Their work appears in journals such as Dementia, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Australasian Journal on Ageing, Qualitative Health Research and International Psychogeriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact