Meredith Flood

12 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Meredith Flood
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 160
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Health 59
  • Conservation 20
  • Demography 54
Replace Jocelyn Angus with:
Jocelyn Angus Australia
William J. Puentes United States
Rotem Perach United Kingdom
Salom M. Teshale United States
Nishi Misra India
Corinne Lewkowicz United States
Jojanneke Korte Netherlands
Khodamorad Momeni‎ Iran
Emma Wolverson United Kingdom
Annette Graham Australia
Meredith Flood relative to Jocelyn Angus Australia Jocelyn Angus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jocelyn Angus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Flood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Flood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Flood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Flood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Flood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Flood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Flood. The network helps show where Meredith Flood may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Flood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Flood Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Flood links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200791
2
A Mid-Range Nursing Theory of Successful Aging
200545
3 200644
4 200944
5
Successful Aging: A Concept Analysis
200243
6 200832
7 200922
8 200621
9 200920
10 200913
11 200712
12 20091
13 20100

About Meredith Flood

Meredith Flood is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Demography and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (5 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (160 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Health (59 citations), Conservation (20 citations) and Demography (54 citations). Meredith Flood has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth D. Phillips, K Schärer, Kathleen C. Buckwalter, Robert B. Clark, Eileen K. Rossen, Kathleen A. Knafl, Dong‐Chul Seo, Mary A. Nies and Maren J. Coffman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gerontological Nursing, Nursing Outlook, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Activities Adaptation & Aging and Home Health Care Management & Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact