Jane Mendle

4.3k citations
58 papers · 2.4k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Mendle

55 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Jane Mendle
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 306
  • Reproductive Medicine 621
  • Clinical Psychology 998
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 463
  • Social Psychology 454
Replace Andrew Boxer with:
Andrew Boxer United States
Kristine Marceau United States
Misaki N. Natsuaki United States
Sonya Negriff United States
Editha D. Nottelmann United States
Stephanie van Goozen United Kingdom
Rebecca A. Turner United States
Jeff Kiesner Italy
Jeffrey M. Armstrong United States
Anthony Charuvastra United States
Jane Mendle relative to Andrew Boxer United States Andrew Boxer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Andrew Boxer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Mendle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Mendle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Mendle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Mendle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Mendle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Mendle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Mendle. The network helps show where Jane Mendle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Mendle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Mendle Line = papers co-authored together Jane Mendle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006408
2 2010198
3 2019136
4 2011132
5 2009128
6 2017101
7 200696
8 201493
9 201180
10 201179
11 200678
12 201467
13 200764
14 201149
15 201541
16 201439
17 201235
18 201434
19 201934
20 201333

About Jane Mendle

Jane Mendle is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Reproductive Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (21 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (19 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (8 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (7 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (7 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (306 citations), Reproductive Medicine (621 citations), Clinical Psychology (998 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (463 citations) and Social Psychology (454 citations). Jane Mendle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include K. Paige Harden, Eric Turkheimer, Robert E. Emery, Jeanne Brooks‐Gunn, Kirsten M.P. McKone, Julia A. Graber, Rebecca M. Ryan, Brian M. D’Onofrio, Adriene M. Beltz and Lorah D. Dorn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research on Adolescence, Developmental Psychology, Clinical Psychological Science, Journal of Youth and Adolescence and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact