Jane McCormack

1.9k citations
48 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jane McCormack

44 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jane McCormack
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 723
  • Occupational Therapy 129
  • Clinical Psychology 333
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 117
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 130
Replace Sue Roulstone with:
Sue Roulstone United Kingdom
Judy Clegg United Kingdom
Amy L. Weiss United States
Miguel Pérez Pereira Spain
Suze Leitão Australia
Gail Gillon New Zealand
Nancy L. Records United States
Carole Kaplan United Kingdom
Jason C. Chow United States
Laura Conway Australia
Jane McCormack relative to Sue Roulstone United Kingdom Sue Roulstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sue Roulstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane McCormack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane McCormack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane McCormack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane McCormack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane McCormack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane McCormack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane McCormack. The network helps show where Jane McCormack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jane McCormack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane McCormack Line = papers co-authored together Jane McCormack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012216
2 2009172
3 2011103
4
The Influence of Teachers.
198680
5 201079
6 201163
7 201058
8 201556
9 200755
10 201350
11 201743
12 201136
13 201623
14 201221
15 201520
16 201719
17 201719
18 201918
19 201718
20 200816

About Jane McCormack

Jane McCormack is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Occupational Therapy, Education and Language and Linguistics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (22 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (7 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (6 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (723 citations), Occupational Therapy (129 citations), Clinical Psychology (333 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (117 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (130 citations). Jane McCormack has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sharynne McLeod, Linda Harrison, Lindy McAllister, Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, Elise Baker, Kathryn Crowe, Yvonne Wren, Sue Roulstone, Sarah Verdon and Linda Worrall. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Child Language Teaching and Therapy, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics and Speech Language and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact