Jane Margolis

3.1k citations
38 papers · 2.0k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Margolis

35 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jane Margolis
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Computer Science Applications 1.3k
  • Gender Studies 895
  • Safety Research 361
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 392
  • Architecture 35
Replace Joanna Goode with:
Joanna Goode United States
Lecia Barker United States
Charlie McDowell United States
Deborah A. Fields United States
Kenneth Ruthven United Kingdom
ChanMin Kim United States
Celia Hoyles United Kingdom
Margaret Honey United States
Niki Davis New Zealand
Christopher Hoadley United States
Jane Margolis relative to Joanna Goode United States Joanna Goode's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Joanna Goode · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Margolis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Margolis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Margolis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Margolis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Margolis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Margolis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Margolis. The network helps show where Jane Margolis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jane Margolis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Margolis Line = papers co-authored together Jane Margolis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002354
2
Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing
2008343
3 2011133
4
The Anatomy of Interest: Women in Undergraduate Computer Science
2000122
5 2014114
6 2012109
7 1997106
8 199975
9 201266
10 201864
11 201363
12 201560
13 201360
14 199756
15 202041
16 201538
17 201637
18 200325
19 202122
20 201721

About Jane Margolis

Jane Margolis is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Gender Studies, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 38 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (28 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (23 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers), Career Development and Diversity (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (1.3k citations), Gender Studies (895 citations), Safety Research (361 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (392 citations) and Architecture (35 citations). Jane Margolis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Allan L. Fisher, Joanna Goode, Faye Miller, Gail Chapman, Jean J. Ryoo, Allan G. B. Fisher, Yasmin B. Kafai, Deborah A. Fields, David Bernier and Jennifer Jellison Holme. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computing Education, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Educational leadership, Computer Science Education and Communications of the ACM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact