Jane M. Bell

4.2k citations
70 papers · 3.5k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Jane M. Bell

70 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Jane M. Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Biochemistry 663
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 1.2k
  • Biological Psychiatry 175
  • Clinical Biochemistry 265
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 449
Replace Michael Chang with:
Michael Chang United States
Kakulavarapu V. Rama Rao United States
Abraham Danon Israel
M. D. Norenberg United States
Anika M. S. Hartz United States
Boris Görg Germany
Gilbert M. Eisner United States
Itzhak Nissim United States
Alan S. Hazell Canada
Masato Katsuyama Japan
Jane M. Bell relative to Michael Chang United States Michael Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michael Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Bell. The network helps show where Jane M. Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane M. Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane M. Bell Line = papers co-authored together Jane M. Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005204
2 2005167
3 2004162
4 1996133
5 2007131
6 2006130
7 2007128
8 2001120
9 200695
10 200893
11 200592
12 201189
13 200483
14 199980
15 200475
16 198772
17 200269
18 199662
19 199762
20 199158

About Jane M. Bell

Jane M. Bell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (13 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (10 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (10 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (8 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (5 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (663 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (175 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (265 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (449 citations). Jane M. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Stanley I. Rapoport, Kaizong Ma, Lisa Chang, James C. DeMar, Miki Igarashi, Michael Chang, Mireille Basselin, Patrick D. Walker, Eric Grange and Francesca Bosetti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Lipid Research, Neurochemical Research, The Journal of Pathology and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact