Jane Lees

810 citations
25 papers · 512 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Lees

25 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Jane Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Biological Psychiatry 94
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 185
  • Pharmacology 154
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 123
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 106
Replace Maura Furey with:
Maura Furey United States
M. Blanaru Israel
Giovanni Giaroli United Kingdom
Ariel Graff Canada
Grant McQueen United Kingdom
Paolo Valsecchi Italy
Martina Flynn United States
Kazuto Oya Japan
M J Arranz United Kingdom
Marina Mitjans Spain
Jane Lees relative to Maura Furey United States Maura Furey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Maura Furey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Lees. The network helps show where Jane Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Lees Line = papers co-authored together Jane Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008245
2 201534
3 201134
4 201731
5 201529
6 201327
7 201319
8 202215
9 200415
10
Detection of apoptosis in colorectal carcinoma by light microscopy and in situ end labelling.
199714
11 198513
12 19886
13 20145
14 20195
15 20213
16 20103
17 20133
18 19872
19 19892
20 20212

About Jane Lees

Jane Lees is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (185 citations), Pharmacology (154 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (123 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (106 citations). Jane Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J.F.W. Deakin, Serdar Dursun, Jaime E. C. Hallak, Shane McKie, S. R. Williams, B.G. Dale, Richard Drake, Shôn Lewis, Shitij Kapur and Richard Emsley. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology, Long Range Planning and Accident Analysis & Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact