Jane Lees

25 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers

Jane Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 104
  • Pharmacology 178
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 197
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 136
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 119
Replace Maura Furey with:
Maura Furey United States
Frank Enning Germany
Giovanni Giaroli United Kingdom
Monica Blanaru Israel
Ung Gu Kang South Korea
Yoshiteru Takekita Japan
Fiona Pepper United Kingdom
Gabriël E. Jacobs Netherlands
Andrea Rotter Germany
Mihisa Fujisaki Japan
Jane Lees relative to Maura Furey United States Maura Furey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Maura Furey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Lees. The network helps show where Jane Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Lees Line = papers co-authored together Jane Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008272
2 201139
3 201537
4 201735
5 201330
6 201530
7 201322
8 202220
9 198515
10 200415
11
Detection of apoptosis in colorectal carcinoma by light microscopy and in situ end labelling.
199714
12 19886
13 20146
14 20196
15 20104
16 20213
17 20133
18 19892
19 20212
20 19872

About Jane Lees

Jane Lees is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (104 citations), Pharmacology (178 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (197 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (136 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (119 citations). Jane Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J.F.W. Deakin, Serdar Murat Dursun, Jaime E. C. Hallak, S. R. Williams, Shane McKie, B.G. Dale, Shôn W. Lewis, Richard Drake, Panayiota G. Michalopoulou and Gahan Pandina. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychopharmacology, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Pharmacopsychiatry and Journal of Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact