Jane Humphries

4.8k citations
94 papers · 2.4k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Humphries

90 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Jane Humphries
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Gender Studies 516
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.4k
  • History 462
  • Public Administration 125
  • Demography 238
Replace Louise A. Tilly with:
Louise A. Tilly United States
Gregory Clark United States
Robert A. Margo United States
Richard Abel United States
Kathryn B. Ward United States
Bryant G. Garth United States
Jane Jenson Canada
Bernard Semmel United States
Roderick Floud United Kingdom
Ira Katznelson United States
Jane Humphries relative to Louise A. Tilly United States Louise A. Tilly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Louise A. Tilly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Humphries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Humphries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Humphries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Humphries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Humphries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Humphries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Humphries. The network helps show where Jane Humphries may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Humphries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Humphries Line = papers co-authored together Jane Humphries links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990133
2 1995129
3 1977122
4 2012116
5 1995108
6 201299
7 199594
8 201990
9 201581
10 200479
11 199269
12 199767
13 198461
14 199655
15 201455
16 201851
17 200451
18 198148
19 199146
20 200344

About Jane Humphries

Jane Humphries is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (39 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (21 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (13 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (516 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.4k citations), History (462 citations), Public Administration (125 citations) and Demography (238 citations). Jane Humphries has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Sara Horrell, Jacob Weisdorf, Carmen Sarasúa, Jill Rubery, Bina Agarwal, Ingrid Robeyns, Benjamin Schneider, Kanchana N. Ruwanpura, Hans‐Joachim Voth and Stanley Siebert. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, Feminist Economics, The Journal of Economic History, Explorations in Economic History and Cambridge Journal of Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact