Jane Halton
Impact in
- Health top 2%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Modeling and Simulation top 2%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research 1
-
- Health and Conflict Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Nicole Lurie (1 shared paper)Mélanie Saville (1 shared paper)Richard Hatchett (1 shared paper)Peter Shergold (1 shared paper)Andrew Podger (1 shared paper)Carlos del Rı́o (1 shared paper)Daniel G. Bausch (1 shared paper)Sandro Galea (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australian Journal of Public Administration (1 paper)Rural and Remote Health (1 paper)New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)The Lancet Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- MalaysiaKazakhstanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Halton
6 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Jane Halton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Health 328
- Modeling and Simulation 172
- Infectious Diseases 594
- General Dentistry 10
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Halton
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Halton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Halton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Halton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Halton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Halton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Halton. The network helps show where Jane Halton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jane Halton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1090 |
| 2 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 5 | Pre-election economic and fiscal outlook 2016 | 2016 | 3 |
| 6 | 2004 | 1 |
About Jane Halton
Jane Halton is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Conflict Studies (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (1 paper), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (1 paper) and Global Security and Public Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (328 citations), Modeling and Simulation (172 citations), Infectious Diseases (594 citations), General Dentistry (10 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (35 citations). Jane Halton has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, Kazakhstan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicole Lurie, Mélanie Saville, Richard Hatchett, Peter Shergold, Andrew Podger, Carlos del Rı́o, Daniel G. Bausch, Sandro Galea, Lawrence O. Gostin and Ricardo B. Leite. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Public Administration, Rural and Remote Health, New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.