Jane E. Cavanaugh

2.2k citations
40 papers · 1.9k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jane E. Cavanaugh

40 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jane E. Cavanaugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Developmental Neuroscience 119
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 410
  • Neurology 119
  • Neurology 195
  • Molecular Biology 662
Replace Jee-Yeon Hwang with:
Jee-Yeon Hwang United States
Emilio Fernández Spain
Norifumi Shioda Japan
James L. Franklin United States
Bo Tian China
Adam R. Cole United Kingdom
Chi‐Tso Chiu Taiwan
Zheng-Hong Qin China
Ronald W. Irwin United States
Jane E. Cavanaugh relative to Jee-Yeon Hwang United States Jee-Yeon Hwang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jee-Yeon Hwang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Cavanaugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Cavanaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Cavanaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Cavanaugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Cavanaugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Cavanaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Cavanaugh. The network helps show where Jane E. Cavanaugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Cavanaugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Cavanaugh Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Cavanaugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999500
2 2000399
3 2001177
4 2003141
5 201785
6 200481
7 200674
8 200755
9 200252
10 201727
11 201925
12 201623
13 201322
14 202122
15 201721
16 201620
17 201418
18 202218
19 202017
20 201714

About Jane E. Cavanaugh

Jane E. Cavanaugh is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (11 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (4 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (119 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (410 citations), Neurology (119 citations), Neurology (195 citations) and Molecular Biology (662 citations). Jane E. Cavanaugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Zhengui Xia, Michal Hetman, Kevin C. Kanning, David Kimelman, Michael J. Zigmond, Joan M. Lakoski, Yan Chen, Steven Poser, Patrick T. Flaherty and Juliann D. Jaumotte. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Oncology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurobiology of Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact