Jane Douglas

17 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Jane Douglas
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Human-Computer Interaction 32
  • Literature and Literary Theory 42
  • Communication 21
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 37
  • Computer Science Applications 15
Replace Robert McKee with:
Robert McKee United States
Palmyre Pierroux Norway
Matt Barton United States
Nils Holmberg Sweden
Anna Matamala Spain
Louise Mifsud Norway
Mikel Asensio Spain
Claire Taylor United Kingdom
Peter Jakobsson Sweden
Jane Douglas relative to Robert McKee United States Robert McKee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert McKee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Douglas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Douglas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Douglas. The network helps show where Jane Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jane Douglas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Douglas Line = papers co-authored together Jane Douglas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200170
2 201247
3 200037
4 201330
5 201820
6 200512
7
Understanding the Act of Reading: the WOE Beginner's Guide to Dissection.
19919
8 19938
9 20156
10
Print pathways and interactive labyrinths : how hypertext narratives affect the act of reading
19936
11 19936
12 19906
13 19943
14 20193
15 20242
16 19962
17
Abandoning the either/or for the and/and/and: Hypertext and the art of argumentative writing
19961
18 20250
19 20160

About Jane Douglas

Jane Douglas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Communication, General Health Professions and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 19 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers), Digital Communication and Language (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper) and Connective tissue disorders research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations), Communication (21 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (37 citations) and Computer Science Applications (15 citations). Jane Douglas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Hargadon, John W. Petersen, Baharak Moshiree, Ashay D. Bhatwadekar, Sergio Li Calzi, Alan W. Stitt, Maria B. Grant, Sergio Caballero, Lynn C. Shaw and Mohan K. Raizada. Their work appears in journals such as International Nursing Review, Leonardo, Social Science Computer Review, Nurse Education Today and ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact