Social Science Computer Review

49.7k citations
1.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Social Media and Politics
    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
    • Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
    • Digital Marketing and Social Media
    • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Papers in

    • Social Media and Politics 452
    • Survey Methodology and Nonresponse 215
    • Impact of Technology on Adolescents 181
    • Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods 111
    • Misinformation and Its Impacts 75

Social Science Computer Review

1.5k papers receiving 43.9k citations

Peers

Social Science Computer Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Communication 13.8k
  • Sociology and Political Science 23.9k
  • Information Systems and Management 3.2k
  • Applied Psychology 1.5k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.8k
Replace California Management Review with:
California Management Review United States
Information Communication & Society United States
First Monday United States
Teaching Sociology United States
Organization Studies United Kingdom
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media United States
Social Networks United States
Telematics and Informatics United States
European Management Journal United Kingdom
Harvard business review United States
Social Science Computer Review relative to California Management Review United States California Management Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
California Management Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Social Science Computer Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Science Computer Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Science Computer Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Computer Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Social Science Computer Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Science Computer Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Science Computer Review.

About Social Science Computer Review

The 1.7k papers published in Social Science Computer Review in the last decades have received a total of 49.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Science Computer Review usually cover Communication (513 papers), Sociology and Political Science (851 papers), General Social Sciences (52 papers), Computer Science Applications (83 papers) and Information Systems and Management (85 papers) specifically the topics of Social Media and Politics (452 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (215 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (181 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (111 papers), E-Government and Public Services (102 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (100 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (84 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Science Computer Review are Eszter Hargittai, Mick P. Couper, Louis Leung, David J. Hand, Joseph B. Walther, Grant Blank, Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour, Azy Barak and Michael Bošnjak.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact