Jane Bourke

1.0k citations
44 papers · 704 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Bourke

41 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

Jane Bourke
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Dermatology 175
  • Immunology and Allergy 55
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 70
  • Strategy and Management 141
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 54
Replace Margaret F. Sloan with:
Margaret F. Sloan United States
David W. Young United States
Helen Bruce United Kingdom
Dagmar Simon Germany
Muhammad Aslam Khan Pakistan
Sharmila Chatterjee United States
Scott Holmes Australia
Herbert Kaufman United States
Ayesha Anwar Pakistan
Jane Bourke relative to Margaret F. Sloan United States Margaret F. Sloan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.3×
Margaret F. Sloan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bourke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bourke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bourke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bourke. The network helps show where Jane Bourke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Bourke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Bourke Line = papers co-authored together Jane Bourke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009123
2 2017100
3 200191
4 201349
5 201645
6 201733
7 201523
8 201622
9 201620
10 201119
11 201917
12 201917
13 201916
14 201815
15 201713
16 202012
17 201710
18 20209
19
Factors associated with staffing provision and medical equipment acquisition in Irish general practice.
20139
20 20148

About Jane Bourke

Jane Bourke is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (5 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (175 citations), Immunology and Allergy (55 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (70 citations), Strategy and Management (141 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (54 citations). Jane Bourke has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Roper, I. H. Coulson, John English, Frank Crowley, Aileen Murphy, Richard A. Greene, Jennifer E. Lutomski, Christopher G. Fawsitt, Brendan McElroy and Mary Joyce. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Innovation Management, Health Policy, Occupational Medicine, Research Policy and Clinical and Experimental Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact