Jane Ashley

13 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Jane Ashley
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Research and Theory 29
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 16
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 153
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • General Health Professions 110
Replace Barbara Wharton McCabe with:
Barbara Wharton McCabe United States
Sarah A. Wilson United States
Eva Götell Sweden
Susan A. Bonis United States
Nan Holmes United Kingdom
Beth P. Velde United States
Rachel Mahoney United Kingdom
Robert H. Llewellyn-Jones Australia
John-Henry Pfifferling United States
Joseph Cipriani United States
Jane Ashley relative to Barbara Wharton McCabe United States Barbara Wharton McCabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Barbara Wharton McCabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Ashley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Ashley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Ashley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Ashley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Ashley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Ashley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Ashley. The network helps show where Jane Ashley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jane Ashley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Ashley Line = papers co-authored together Jane Ashley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1999108
2 199573
3 200934
4 201434
5 199131
6 199922
7 200520
8 199414
9 198812
10
Neglect: what part of abuse?
198612
11 197211
12 198910
13
Breaking the nation : a guide to Thatcher's Britain
19853

About Jane Ashley

Jane Ashley is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Psychiatry and Mental health, Demography and Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (3 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (29 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (16 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (153 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations) and General Health Professions (110 citations). Jane Ashley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Woods, Kelly D. Stamp, Ann C. Hurley, Ladislav Volicer, Wee Lock Ooi, Germaine L. Odenheimer, Kevin McIntyre, Terry Fulmer, Stuart J. Marsden and Helen J. Chenery. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Education, Cortex, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of Economic Entomology and Applied Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact