Jane A. Walker
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Nursing education and management
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 10%
Papers in
-
- Nursing Roles and Practices 6
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 3
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
-
- Nursing education and management 2
- Co-authors
- Linda D. Urden (3 shared papers)Nigel Mathers (2 shared papers)Sharon Bourgeois (1 shared paper)Stephen J. Walters (1 shared paper)Caroline Mitchell (1 shared paper)Anne Morgan (1 shared paper)Janet S. Fulton (3 shared papers)Ann M. Mayo (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Nurse Specialist (5 papers)JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (2 papers)Medical Education (1 paper)Nursing Outlook (1 paper)Nurse Education Today (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Jane A. Walker
12 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Research and Theory 44
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
- General Health Professions 101
- Leadership and Management 4
- Family Practice 5
Countries citing papers authored by Jane A. Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane A. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane A. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane A. Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane A. Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane A. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane A. Walker. The network helps show where Jane A. Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jane A. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 8 | The impact of a general practice group intervention on prescribing costs and patterns. | 2002 | 15 |
| 9 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 0 |
About Jane A. Walker
Jane A. Walker is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (44 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), General Health Professions (101 citations), Leadership and Management (4 citations) and Family Practice (5 citations). Jane A. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Linda D. Urden, Nigel Mathers, Sharon Bourgeois, Stephen J. Walters, Caroline Mitchell, Anne Morgan, Janet S. Fulton, Ann M. Mayo, Chris Roberts and Alan O’Rourke. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Nurse Specialist, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Medical Education, Nursing Outlook and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.