Valorie Dearmon

16 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Valorie Dearmon
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Research and Theory 90
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 31
  • Leadership and Management 12
  • Emergency Medical Services 59
  • General Health Professions 152
Replace Ann Bowling with:
Ann Bowling United States
Trisha Leann Horsley United States
Nancy Phoenix Bittner United States
KT Waxman United States
Carmen La Cerra Italy
Beth Hallmark United States
Mary Schoessler United States
Sandra Goldsworthy Canada
Kathy Chappell United States
Fiona Geddes Australia
Valorie Dearmon relative to Ann Bowling United States Ann Bowling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Ann Bowling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Valorie Dearmon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Valorie Dearmon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Valorie Dearmon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Valorie Dearmon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Valorie Dearmon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Valorie Dearmon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Valorie Dearmon. The network helps show where Valorie Dearmon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Valorie Dearmon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Valorie Dearmon Line = papers co-authored together Valorie Dearmon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201291
2 201381
3 201239
4 201732
5 201816
6 201512
7 201412
8 201611
9 201211
10 20187
11 20165
12 20114
13 20194
14 20172
15 20162
16 20161

About Valorie Dearmon

Valorie Dearmon is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (5 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (90 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (31 citations), Leadership and Management (12 citations), Emergency Medical Services (59 citations) and General Health Professions (152 citations). Valorie Dearmon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Graves, Madhuri S. Mulekar, Loretta Jones, Ellen B. Buckner, Linda Roussel, Stephanie Brown, Helen M. Taggart, Ann Brown, Heather R. Hall and Christine E. Skotzko. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Administration Quarterly, Journal of Nursing Education, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Journal of Professional Nursing and Journal of Nursing Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact