Jane A. Rycroft
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Papers in
-
- Tea Polyphenols and Effects 12
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Eveline A. de Bruin (5 shared papers)Joan Lane (2 shared papers)Gail Owen (4 shared papers)I. Hindmarch (1 shared paper)Una Rigney (1 shared paper)Neil Stanley (1 shared paper)M. Rowson (2 shared papers)Éva Kovács (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Appetite (3 papers)Psychopharmacology (3 papers)Nutritional Neuroscience (2 papers)European Journal of Applied Physiology (1 paper)Clinical Neuropharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane A. Rycroft
17 papers receiving 994 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Biological Psychiatry 138
- Biochemistry 196
- Sensory Systems 133
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 461
- Pharmacology 277
Countries citing papers authored by Jane A. Rycroft
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane A. Rycroft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane A. Rycroft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane A. Rycroft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane A. Rycroft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane A. Rycroft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane A. Rycroft. The network helps show where Jane A. Rycroft may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane A. Rycroft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 190 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 155 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 125 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 91 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 82 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 80 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 71 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 18 | The effects of chronic tea intake on platelet activation and vascular biology: a double-blind placebo controlled trial | 2007 | 0 |
About Jane A. Rycroft
Jane A. Rycroft is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Sensory Systems, Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tea Polyphenols and Effects (12 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Coffee research and impacts (4 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (1 paper) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (138 citations), Biochemistry (196 citations), Sensory Systems (133 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (461 citations) and Pharmacology (277 citations). Jane A. Rycroft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eveline A. de Bruin, Joan Lane, Gail Owen, I. Hindmarch, Una Rigney, Neil Stanley, M. Rowson, Éva Kovács, David J. Mela and Jorge D. Erusalimsky. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Psychopharmacology, Nutritional Neuroscience, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Clinical Neuropharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.