Jan Wacker

3.4k citations
67 papers · 2.5k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Wacker

67 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Jan Wacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 885
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Applied Psychology 231
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 154
  • Clinical Psychology 551
Replace Ewald Naumann with:
Ewald Naumann Germany
Jiajin Yuan China
Alexandre Schaefer United Kingdom
Rebecca M. Todd Canada
Henk van Steenbergen Netherlands
Sabine Miriam Grüsser Germany
Gennady G. Knyazev Russia
Issidoros C. Sarinopoulos United States
Thomas Dresler Germany
Rebecca J. Compton United States
Jan Wacker relative to Ewald Naumann Germany Ewald Naumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ewald Naumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Wacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Wacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Wacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Wacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Wacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Wacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Wacker. The network helps show where Jan Wacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Wacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Wacker Line = papers co-authored together Jan Wacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009342
2 2006126
3 2003124
4 2009105
5 201598
6 201394
7 200991
8 200685
9 201178
10 200776
11 201876
12 201872
13 201368
14 200865
15 201152
16 200650
17 201348
18 200845
19 201743
20 200939

About Jan Wacker

Jan Wacker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (36 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (18 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (13 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (11 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (885 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Applied Psychology (231 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (154 citations) and Clinical Psychology (551 citations). Jan Wacker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Stemmler, Mira‐Lynn Chavanon, Diego Pizzagalli, Daniel G. Dillon, Erik Malte Mueller, Luke David Smillie, Jürgen Hennig, Marcus Heldmann, Anja Leue and Tatjana Aue. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychology, Psychophysiology, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact