Michael Pütz
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.05%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Papers in
- Toxicology 25
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 25
- Spectroscopy 33
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 25
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 25
- Co-authors
- Volker Auwärter (13 shared papers)Nerea Ferreirós (2 shared papers)Sebastian Dresen (2 shared papers)Ralf C. Zimmermann (21 shared papers)Wolfgang Weinmann (1 shared paper)Michael Andreas Müller (1 shared paper)Folker Westphal (13 shared papers)Carolin Hühn (16 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Michael Pütz
82 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Michael Pütz's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Toxicology 960
- Pharmacology 739
- Spectroscopy 477
- Clinical Psychology 383
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 303
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pütz
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pütz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pütz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pütz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pütz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pütz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pütz. The network helps show where Michael Pütz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pütz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ‘Spice’ and other herbal blends: harmless incense or cannabinoid designer drugs? Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 574 |
| 2 | 2010 | 271 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 141 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 116 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 74 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 60 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 45 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 25 |
About Michael Pütz
Michael Pütz is a scholar working on Toxicology, Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (25 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (25 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (25 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (13 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (10 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (10 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (960 citations), Pharmacology (739 citations), Spectroscopy (477 citations), Clinical Psychology (383 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (303 citations). Michael Pütz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Volker Auwärter, Nerea Ferreirós, Sebastian Dresen, Ralf C. Zimmermann, Wolfgang Weinmann, Michael Andreas Müller, Folker Westphal, Carolin Hühn, Ute Pyell and Gerd Walz. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Electrophoresis, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Human Molecular Genetics and Forensic Science International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.