Jan Schadrack

1.8k citations
30 papers · 1.3k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Schadrack

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jan Schadrack
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 483
  • Physiology 376
  • Neurology 188
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 189
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 135
Replace Nada Lawand with:
Nada Lawand United States
Lars Jørgen Rygh Norway
Dong‐Yuan Cao China
Isobel J. Lever United Kingdom
Katharina M. Hösl Germany
Kristina Bayerlein Germany
F Savoldi Italy
Bennett Blumenkopf United States
Martyn G. Jones United Kingdom
J. Lianne Leith United Kingdom
Jan Schadrack relative to Nada Lawand United States Nada Lawand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Nada Lawand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Schadrack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Schadrack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Schadrack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Schadrack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Schadrack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Schadrack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Schadrack. The network helps show where Jan Schadrack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Schadrack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Schadrack Line = papers co-authored together Jan Schadrack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001129
2 2011109
3 201994
4 200192
5 200074
6 202172
7 201070
8 199459
9 199955
10 200351
11 199951
12 200350
13 199949
14 199448
15
6-O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-6-O-desmethyldiprenorphine ([18F]DPN): synthesis, biologic evaluation, and comparison with [11C]DPN in humans.
200040
16 199739
17 200028
18 199628
19 200126
20 199823

About Jan Schadrack

Jan Schadrack is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (483 citations), Physiology (376 citations), Neurology (188 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (189 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (135 citations). Jan Schadrack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include W. Zieglgänsberger, Thomas R. Tölle, José Manuel Castro‐Lopes, Fani Neto, Maneesha Mehra, Achim Berthele, Beatrice Mahal, Stefan Platzer, Rainer Spanagel and Peter Bartenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Neurology, Progress in brain research, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact