Progress in brain research

6.5k papers and 225.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.5k papers published in Progress in brain research in the last decades have received a total of 225.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in brain research usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.6k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.2k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (610 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (469 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in brain research are Rudolf Nieuwenhuys, William D. S. Killgore, Gert Holstege, Nelson Cowan, H.G.J.M. Kuypers, Johan F. Storm, Patricia S. Goldman‐Rakic, Dick F. Swaab, Wayne C. Drevets and Barbara E. Jones.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in brain research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in brain research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in brain research.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in brain research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in brain research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in brain research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in brain research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025