James Vernoit
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Papers in
-
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 2
-
- Youth Education and Societal Dynamics 1
- Income, Poverty, and Inequality 1
- Co-authors
- Nattavudh Powdthavee (2 shared papers)Richard Layard (1 shared paper)Andrew E. Clark (1 shared paper)Francesca Cornaglia (1 shared paper)Stephen Machin (2 shared papers)Catherine North (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Labour Economics (1 paper)The Economic Journal (1 paper)Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) (1 paper)London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
James Vernoit
5 papers receiving 247 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Health 63
- Social Psychology 105
- General Health Professions 71
- Applied Psychology 14
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
Countries citing papers authored by James Vernoit
This map shows the geographic impact of James Vernoit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Vernoit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Vernoit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Vernoit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Vernoit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Vernoit. The network helps show where James Vernoit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside James Vernoit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 162 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 65 | |
| 3 | The economic value of key intermediate qualifications: estimating the returns and lifetime productivity gains to GCSEs, A levels and apprenticeships | 2014 | 14 |
| 4 | Changing School Autonomy: Academy Schools and Their Introduction to England's Education. CEE DP 123. | 2011 | 12 |
| 5 | A note on academy school policy | 2010 | 3 |
About James Vernoit
James Vernoit is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 5 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Education Systems and Policy (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1 paper), Economic Growth and Productivity (1 paper), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper), Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (63 citations), Social Psychology (105 citations), General Health Professions (71 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations). James Vernoit has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Nattavudh Powdthavee, Richard Layard, Andrew E. Clark, Francesca Cornaglia, Stephen Machin and Catherine North. Their work appears in journals such as Labour Economics, The Economic Journal, Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) and London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.