James S. Smith

851 citations
29 papers · 649 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Esophageal and GI Pathology 2
    • Polymer crystallization and properties 4
    • Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties 3

James S. Smith

28 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

James S. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Urology 42
  • Spectroscopy 94
  • Polymers and Plastics 76
  • Surgery 178
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 31
Replace Martin McMillan with:
Martin McMillan United Kingdom
Martin Kreuzer Germany
T Jamieson United States
S. Lüsse Germany
Tadashi INABA Japan
Krzysztof Górny Poland
K. L. Narasimhan India
Bernd K. Wittmann Canada
Midori Tanaka Japan
James S. Smith relative to Martin McMillan United Kingdom Martin McMillan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Martin McMillan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James S. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Smith. The network helps show where James S. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James S. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James S. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James S. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198272
2 200372
3 197165
4 200456
5 200752
6 199250
7 198847
8 199847
9 197142
10 198729
11
QOL and outcomes research in prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status.
199923
12 199316
13 200514
14 200611
15 19829
16 20019
17 19927
18 19904
19 19974
20 20173

About James S. Smith

James S. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Polymers and Plastics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polymer crystallization and properties (4 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (3 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (3 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (3 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (2 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (2 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (42 citations), Spectroscopy (94 citations), Polymers and Plastics (76 citations), Surgery (178 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (31 citations). James S. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Grant D. Smith, Oleg Borodin, Dmitry Bedrov, John R. Anderson, R. Carter, Edward M. Kober, Fred W. McLafferty, R.A. Kornfeld, David J. McAdoo and A McGeorge. Their work appears in journals such as Carcinogenesis, British journal of surgery, The Journal of Chemical Physics, The FASEB Journal and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact