James S. Smith

846 citations
28 papers · 615 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Esophageal and GI Pathology 2
    • Polymer crystallization and properties 4
    • Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties 3

James S. Smith

27 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

James S. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Urology 57
  • Spectroscopy 92
  • Polymers and Plastics 73
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 30
  • Surgery 184
Replace S. Lüsse with:
S. Lüsse Germany
Martin McMillan United Kingdom
Kazuhiro Yamauchi Japan
Martin Kreuzer Germany
T Jamieson United Kingdom
He Yuan China
Tadashi INABA Japan
Kenichi Shimura Japan
Bernd K. Wittmann Canada
James S. Smith relative to S. Lüsse Germany S. Lüsse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.4×
S. Lüsse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James S. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Smith. The network helps show where James S. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James S. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James S. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James S. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200369
2 198267
3 197165
4 200456
5 200749
6 199248
7 199844
8 197141
9 198839
10 198728
11
QOL and outcomes research in prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status.
199921
12 199315
13 200513
14 200611
15 19829
16 20019
17 19926
18 19904
19 19974
20 20173

About James S. Smith

James S. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Polymers and Plastics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polymer crystallization and properties (4 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (3 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (3 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (57 citations), Spectroscopy (92 citations), Polymers and Plastics (73 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (30 citations) and Surgery (184 citations). James S. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Grant D. Smith, Oleg Borodin, Dmitry Bedrov, R. Carter, John R. Anderson, Fred W. McLafferty, Edward M. Kober, David J. McAdoo, R.A. Kornfeld and A McGeorge. Their work appears in journals such as Carcinogenesis, British journal of surgery, Macromolecules, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Periodontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact