James Phillips

72 papers receiving 847 citations

Peers

James Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Space and Planetary Science 56
  • General Psychology 50
  • Clinical Psychology 431
  • Philosophy 241
  • Archeology 135
Replace Steve Edwards with:
Steve Edwards South Africa
Elisa Perego Italy
Robert Hopkins United Kingdom
Jennifer Whiting United States
Johan De Smedt Belgium
Uffe Schjoedt Denmark
Russell A. Lockhart United States
Robert H. Woody United States
Peter Brook United Kingdom
Eugene Taylor United States
James Phillips relative to Steve Edwards South Africa Steve Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.1×
Steve Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Phillips. The network helps show where James Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Phillips Line = papers co-authored together James Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985312
2 2002191
3 196446
4 200343
5 199342
6 199038
7 201332
8 199432
9 201731
10
Imagination and its Pathologies
200330
11 196529
12 199625
13
Assessment tools: functional health status and patient satisfaction.
199624
14 200521
15 200321
16
Heidegger's Volk: Between National Socialism and Poetry
200513
17
Tragic Play: Irony and Theater from Sophocles to Beckett
20099
18 19709
19 20208
20 19698

About James Phillips

James Phillips is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (25 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (8 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (5 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (5 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (5 papers) and Low-power high-performance VLSI design (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (56 citations), General Psychology (50 citations), Clinical Psychology (431 citations), Philosophy (241 citations) and Archeology (135 citations). James Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include S. Vassiliadis, Stephanie Moser, Susan Richardson, Andrew K. Conner, Joel Paris, James Morley, B. Blaner, W. J. Turner, John E. Ware and Richard G. Niemi. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology, American Journal of Psychiatry, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Shakespeare Quarterly and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact