Daniel Antonius

62 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Antonius
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 836
  • Clinical Psychology 272
  • Sensory Systems 61
  • Applied Psychology 49
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
Replace Jason Johannesen with:
Jason Johannesen United States
Hai‐song Shi China
Kristen A. Woodberry United States
Łukasz Gawęda Poland
Michael R. Bagby Canada
Dennis Golm United Kingdom
Anu Emilia Castaneda Finland
Katherine Grace Jonas United States
Ruchika Gajwani United Kingdom
Tom A. Hummer United States
Daniel Antonius relative to Jason Johannesen United States Jason Johannesen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Jason Johannesen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Antonius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Antonius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Antonius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Antonius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Antonius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Antonius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Antonius. The network helps show where Daniel Antonius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Antonius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Antonius Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Antonius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010228
2 2014139
3 201099
4 201678
5 201176
6 200868
7 201455
8 200949
9 201046
10 201341
11 201136
12 201135
13 201732
14 201026
15 201326
16 201225
17 201524
18 201523
19 201222
20 200821

About Daniel Antonius

Daniel Antonius is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sensory Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (36 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (4 papers), Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (3 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (836 citations), Clinical Psychology (272 citations), Sensory Systems (61 citations), Applied Psychology (49 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (8 citations). Daniel Antonius has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Dolores Malaspina, Fabien Trémeau, Daniel C. Javitt, Julie Walsh‐Messinger, Matthew J. Hoptman, Arielle D. Stanford, Cristina J. Mauro, Samuel Justin Sinclair, Raymond R. Goetz and Adam D. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychiatry Research, American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment and International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact