James Peek
Impact in
- Parasitology top 5%
- Bartonella species infections research
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Vibrio bacteria research studies
Papers in
-
- Biochemical and Molecular Research 3
- Polyamine Metabolism and Applications 3
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 2
-
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 2
- Co-authors
- Robert K. Taylor (1 shared paper)Dinesh Christendat (7 shared papers)J. Loutit (1 shared paper)Stanley Falkow (1 shared paper)Lucy S. Tompkins (1 shared paper)Wenzislava Ckurshumova (1 shared paper)Karl J. Schreiber (1 shared paper)Darrell Desveaux (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)The Plant Journal (2 papers)SLAS DISCOVERY (1 paper)Molecular Microbiology (1 paper)Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
James Peek
15 papers receiving 523 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Parasitology 98
- Endocrinology 76
- Molecular Medicine 48
- Virology 35
- Infectious Diseases 89
Countries citing papers authored by James Peek
This map shows the geographic impact of James Peek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Peek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Peek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Peek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Peek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Peek. The network helps show where James Peek may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Peek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 196 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 103 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 1 |
About James Peek
James Peek is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Medicine, Materials Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (98 citations), Endocrinology (76 citations), Molecular Medicine (48 citations), Virology (35 citations) and Infectious Diseases (89 citations). James Peek has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert K. Taylor, Dinesh Christendat, J. Loutit, Stanley Falkow, Lucy S. Tompkins, Wenzislava Ckurshumova, Karl J. Schreiber, Darrell Desveaux, Sean F. Brady and J. Jack Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Plant Journal, SLAS DISCOVERY, Molecular Microbiology and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.