James McCall

1.3k citations
48 papers · 978 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

James McCall

42 papers receiving 915 citations

Peers

James McCall
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 345
  • Reproductive Medicine 159
  • Inorganic Chemistry 129
  • Internal Medicine 26
  • Gastroenterology 41
Replace Steven J. Skoog with:
Steven J. Skoog United States
K L Reed United States
Lorenzo Luciani Italy
Paulos Yohannes United States
Aleksandar Stefanović Serbia
Jun Ho Shin South Korea
Justin Kupec United States
Mary A. Wood United States
Roger Ackroyd United Kingdom
Karl Thomas Belgium
James McCall relative to Steven J. Skoog United States Steven J. Skoog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Steven J. Skoog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James McCall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James McCall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James McCall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James McCall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James McCall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James McCall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James McCall. The network helps show where James McCall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James McCall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James McCall Line = papers co-authored together James McCall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997166
2 2000140
3 198487
4 201075
5
The efficacy of percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients.
199648
6 199947
7 200046
8 198038
9 200234
10 198230
11 200528
12 200025
13 198220
14 201418
15 198318
16 200812
17 198712
18 197112
19 198411
20 198410

About James McCall

James McCall is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Organic Chemistry, Surgery, Internal Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 978 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (5 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (5 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (5 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (3 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (345 citations), Reproductive Medicine (159 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (129 citations), Internal Medicine (26 citations) and Gastroenterology (41 citations). James McCall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alan Shaver, James R. Smith, Paul Burn, Arvind Vashisht, Jeremiah C. Healy, Giuseppe Del Priore, D. Corless, Jackie Bridges, Iain Lindsay and László Ungár. Their work appears in journals such as Organometallics, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, British Journal of Radiology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact