Thomas E. J. Ind

3.4k citations
105 papers · 2.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. J. Ind

103 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Thomas E. J. Ind
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 830
  • Reproductive Medicine 702
  • Surgery 453
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 181
  • Oncology 187
Replace Fabio Martinelli with:
Fabio Martinelli Italy
Brigitte F M Slangen Netherlands
Konald A. Prem United States
Ignacio Zapardiel Spain
J. H. Shepherd United Kingdom
Ichio Fukasawa Japan
Edward J. Tanner United States
Daniel F.G. Dargent France
Andrea Giannini Italy
Andrew P. Soisson United States
Thomas E. J. Ind relative to Fabio Martinelli Italy Fabio Martinelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Fabio Martinelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. J. Ind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. J. Ind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. J. Ind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. J. Ind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. J. Ind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. J. Ind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. J. Ind. The network helps show where Thomas E. J. Ind may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. J. Ind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. J. Ind Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. J. Ind links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004265
2 2015112
3 200994
4 201484
5 200272
6 200871
7 201667
8 201755
9 200648
10 201847
11 199545
12 201143
13 200443
14 201041
15 201939
16 202038
17 199735
18 202231
19 199430
20 200829

About Thomas E. J. Ind

Thomas E. J. Ind is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 105 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (31 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (24 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (8 papers), Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (830 citations), Reproductive Medicine (702 citations), Surgery (453 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (181 citations) and Oncology (187 citations). Thomas E. J. Ind has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Desmond P.J. Barton, John H. Shepherd, Nandita M. deSouza, Jackie Bridges, Alexandros Laios, Veronica A. Morgan, Syed Aslam Sohaib, Marielle Nobbenhuis, Martin Eric Gore and Ray K. Iles. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology and European Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact