James Jamison

66 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

James Jamison
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Algebra and Number Theory 401
  • Mathematical Physics 541
  • Applied Mathematics 435
  • Geometry and Topology 121
  • Statistics and Probability 82
Replace Kichi-Suke Saito with:
Kichi-Suke Saito Japan
Domingo A. Herrero United States
Joseph A. Cima United States
Åsvald Lima Norway
Manuel Maestre Spain
Florian-Horia Vasilescu France
Bruce Barnes United States
Bertram Yood United States
K. de Leeuw United States
Arlen Brown United States
James Jamison relative to Kichi-Suke Saito Japan Kichi-Suke Saito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Kichi-Suke Saito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Jamison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Jamison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Jamison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Jamison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Jamison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Jamison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Jamison. The network helps show where James Jamison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside James Jamison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Jamison Line = papers co-authored together James Jamison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Isometries on Banach Spaces: function spaces
2002154
2 197441
3 200235
4 200933
5 200129
6 197629
7 199029
8 199121
9 200721
10 200618
11 201316
12 201116
13 199415
14 200714
15 197413
16 200913
17 200412
18 201112
19 201012
20 197711

About James Jamison

James Jamison is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 71 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (40 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (36 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (32 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (14 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (9 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (8 papers), advanced mathematical theories (5 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (401 citations), Mathematical Physics (541 citations), Applied Mathematics (435 citations), Geometry and Topology (121 citations) and Statistics and Probability (82 citations). James Jamison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Fleming, Fernanda Botelho, Richard Fleming, James T. Campbell, Jerome A. Goldstein, Anna Kamińska, Peter Greim, Lajos Molnár, M. Rajagopalan and Grzegorz Lewicki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Studia Mathematica, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Mathematische Zeitschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact