James E. Weber

43 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

James E. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Reproductive Medicine 474
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 111
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 312
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 114
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
Replace Kenneth E. Clark with:
Kenneth E. Clark United States
Markus Müller Germany
Michael Schenk Germany
Andrew Watson United Kingdom
Wei Hua China
Daniel J. Miller United States
Jonathan Webster United States
Joseph Boyle United States
Sigrid Sterckx Belgium
Craig A. Peterson United States
James E. Weber relative to Kenneth E. Clark United States Kenneth E. Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.8×
Kenneth E. Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Weber. The network helps show where James E. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Weber Line = papers co-authored together James E. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983159
2 2001129
3 2000116
4 1987114
5 2005105
6 198770
7 198370
8 198865
9 200463
10 198662
11 200656
12 200354
13 198748
14 200242
15 200041
16 200337
17 200035
18 200825
19 201123
20 199523

About James E. Weber

James E. Weber is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Information Systems and Molecular Biology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (8 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (2 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (2 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (474 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (111 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (312 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (114 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations). James E. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lonnie D. Russell, Paula S. Weber, R. N. Peterson, Vivien Wong, A. Wayne Vogl, Ronald F. Maio, Frederic C. Blow, Mary Ann Gregor, Jean T. Shope and Michele M. Nypaver. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Emergency Medicine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Business Ethics, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics and Journal of Computer Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact