James E. Smith

980 citations
13 papers · 818 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Smith

13 papers receiving 763 citations

Peers

James E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Hardware and Architecture 99
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 218
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 90
  • Water Science and Technology 127
  • Pollution 71
Replace Paul R. Shorten with:
Paul R. Shorten New Zealand
Nina Lackner Austria
Michael Madsen Denmark
Xue He China
Young-Kee Kim South Korea
Ma. Remedios Mendoza-López Mexico
Jan Lochman Czechia
Paolo Longoni Switzerland
Jingyan Zhang China
Olaf Kaiser Germany
James E. Smith relative to Paul R. Shorten New Zealand Paul R. Shorten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×80×99×
Paul R. Shorten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Smith. The network helps show where James E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside James E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2005412
2 199995
3 199577
4 200873
5 198859
6
M R M
200855
7 200810
8 19869
9 19888
10
Strategies for Teaching the Mentally Retarded
19818
11 19516
12 19844
13 19842

About James E. Smith

James E. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Infectious Diseases and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 13 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (99 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (218 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (90 citations), Water Science and Technology (127 citations) and Pollution (71 citations). James E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Charles P. Gerba, Conchita Co, Steven I. Dworkin, Scott E. Hemby, S. I. Dworkin, Mateo Valero, Miquel Moretó, Kyle J. Nesbit, Francisco J. Cazorla and Nick E. Goeders. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, IEEE Micro, Journal of Environmental Quality, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact