James E. H. Day

522 citations
9 papers · 251 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Heat shock proteins research 3
    • ATP Synthase and ATPases Research 2
    • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 2
    • Cell death mechanisms and regulation 2
    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 2

James E. H. Day

9 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers

James E. H. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Toxicology 17
  • Organic Chemistry 88
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 42
  • Molecular Biology 167
  • Pharmacology 32
Replace Tatiana McHardy with:
Tatiana McHardy United Kingdom
Jon J. Hangeland United States
Dušan Ružić Serbia
Rebecca A. Gallego United States
Aman Iqbal United Kingdom
Jesús Vázquez Spain
Sandrine Thieffine Italy
Ashok C. Bajji United States
Christine Kaiser United States
Jean‐Michel Robert France
James E. H. Day relative to Tatiana McHardy United Kingdom Tatiana McHardy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Tatiana McHardy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. H. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. H. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. H. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. H. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. H. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. H. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. H. Day. The network helps show where James E. H. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. H. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. H. Day Line = papers co-authored together James E. H. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201567
2 201757
3 200949
4 201030
5 201021
6 201116
7 20157
8 20223
9 20091

About James E. H. Day

James E. H. Day is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Cancer Research, having authored 9 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (2 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Activity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (17 citations), Organic Chemistry (88 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (42 citations), Molecular Biology (167 citations) and Pharmacology (32 citations). James E. H. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Workman, Christopher J. Moody, Martin Rowlands, Swee Y. Sharp, Wynne Aherne, Michael Reader, George A. Ward, Sharna J. Rich, Pamela A. Williams and Ildiko M. Buck. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry - A European Journal, Synlett, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact