James D. Mitchell

787 citations
65 papers · 427 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

James D. Mitchell

53 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

James D. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Geometry and Topology 152
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 46
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 227
  • Algebra and Number Theory 49
  • Inorganic Chemistry 99
Replace Ronald van Luijk with:
Ronald van Luijk Canada
A. Sinan Çevik Türkiye
S. A. Jennings United Kingdom
Hilal A. Ganie India
M. R. Darafsheh Iran
Lihua You China
V. R. Kulli India
Christopher B. Spencer Hong Kong
András Bíró Hungary
James D. Mitchell relative to Ronald van Luijk Canada Ronald van Luijk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Ronald van Luijk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Mitchell. The network helps show where James D. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James D. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together James D. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197746
2 197744
3 197739
4 200331
5 197419
6 200317
7 201014
8 200613
9 200312
10 200912
11 201111
12 201611
13 200611
14 200210
15 200710
16 201810
17 20128
18 20118
19 20027
20 20117

About James D. Mitchell

James D. Mitchell is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Algebra and Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, having authored 65 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (40 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (17 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (17 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (11 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (11 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (9 papers), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (5 papers) and Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (152 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (46 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (227 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (49 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (99 citations). James D. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Samuel O. Grim, Nik Ruškuc, Peter M. Higgins, João Araüjo, John Del Gaudio, Richard C. Barth, S. O. Grim, Michał Morayne, John Howie and Vítor H. Fernandes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Semigroup Forum, Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of the London Mathematical Society and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact