Peter M. Higgins

66 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

Peter M. Higgins
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 575
  • Geometry and Topology 253
  • Algebra and Number Theory 108
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 69
  • Management Science and Operations Research 120
Replace Haim Judah with:
Haim Judah Israel
Katsuya Eda Japan
E. H. Connell United States
Charles Ehresmann United States
Tom C. Brown Canada
Robert H. Oehmke United States
A. V. Mikhalëv Russia
John W. Gray United States
Nicolae Popescu Romania
K. P. S. Bhaskara Rao India
Peter M. Higgins relative to Haim Judah Israel Haim Judah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.4×
Haim Judah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Higgins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Higgins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Higgins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Higgins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Higgins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Higgins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Higgins. The network helps show where Peter M. Higgins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. Higgins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter M. Higgins Line = papers co-authored together Peter M. Higgins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992193
2 199338
3 199836
4 199531
5 200330
6 198728
7 199823
8 198819
9 202317
10 200317
11 198416
12 199416
13 199014
14 202113
15 198113
16 202112
17 198312
18 202112
19 200612
20 202411

About Peter M. Higgins

Peter M. Higgins is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Management Science and Operations Research and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 77 papers that have together received 769 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (49 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (21 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (12 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (11 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (8 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (5 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (575 citations), Geometry and Topology (253 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (108 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (69 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (120 citations). Peter M. Higgins has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nik Ruškuc, John Howie, Charles S. Cockell, James D. Mitchell, Stuart Margolis, Barbara Sherwood Lollar, Oliver Warr, Jorge Almeida, Christopher R. Glein and Michał Morayne. Their work appears in journals such as Semigroup Forum, Astrobiology, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact