James Close

739 citations
27 papers · 561 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Close

25 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers

James Close
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Clinical Psychology 224
  • General Health Professions 145
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
  • Sociology and Political Science 119
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 4
Replace Lili Xie with:
Lili Xie China
Fam te Poel Netherlands
Kelly M Ramsey United States
Jingyu Shi China
Ingrid M. E. Munck Sweden
Nicholas Page United Kingdom
Chloé Lau Canada
Hugo Miguel Santos Duarte Portugal
Mirte A G Kuipers Netherlands
James Close relative to Lili Xie China Lili Xie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Lili Xie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Close

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Close's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Close with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Close more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Close

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Close. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Close. The network helps show where James Close may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Close, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Close Line = papers co-authored together James Close links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202193
2 202160
3 200851
4 202247
5 201841
6 201836
7 202136
8 201828
9 201828
10 202221
11 201717
12 202215
13 202313
14 202111
15 202111
16 20199
17 20187
18 20227
19 20105
20 20125

About James Close

James Close is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Health Information Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (11 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (224 citations), General Health Professions (145 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations), Sociology and Political Science (119 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (4 citations). James Close has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Helen Mary Lloyd, Stuart Gordon Spicer, Laura Louise Nicklin, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Maria Uther, Richard Byng, José M Valderas, Hannah C. Wheat, Thavapriya Sugavanam and Chris Fullwood. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Addictive Behaviors, Royal Society Open Science and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact