Thomas Raymen

626 citations
18 papers · 311 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Raymen

18 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Thomas Raymen
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Marketing 45
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 53
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • Sociology and Political Science 177
  • Geography, Planning and Development 17
Replace Gregory Stratton with:
Gregory Stratton Australia
Michael McCahill United Kingdom
Joel G. Maxcy United States
Gary P. Hampson Australia
Cesare Beccaria
Mark Featherstone United Kingdom
Timothy J. Gilfoyle United States
Colin Rogers United Kingdom
Alyce McGovern Australia
John A. Noakes United States
Thomas Raymen relative to Gregory Stratton Australia Gregory Stratton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Gregory Stratton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Raymen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Raymen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Raymen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Raymen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Raymen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Raymen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Raymen. The network helps show where Thomas Raymen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Raymen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Raymen Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Raymen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201664
2 201743
3 202135
4 201532
5 201522
6 201820
7 201518
8
The Enigma of Social Harm and the Barrier of Liberalism: Why Zemiology needs a theory of the Good
201917
9 201914
10 201710
11 201910
12
Parkour, Deviance and Leisure in the Late Capitalist City
20188
13 20227
14 20213
15 20223
16 20212
17 20212
18 20211

About Thomas Raymen

Thomas Raymen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (7 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (3 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (45 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (53 citations), Clinical Psychology (89 citations), Sociology and Political Science (177 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (17 citations). Thomas Raymen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Smith, Jonathan Parke, Helen Lloyd, Stuart Gordon Spicer, James Close, Joanne Lloyd, Simon Winlow, Laura Louise Nicklin and Anthony Lloyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consumer Culture, The British Journal of Criminology, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Critical Criminology and Crime Media Culture An International Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact