James Carney

1.4k citations
37 papers · 576 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

James Carney

35 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

James Carney
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 228
  • Social Psychology 192
  • Classics 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 99
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 60
Replace Lisa Zunshine with:
Lisa Zunshine United States
Richard Rawles United Kingdom
William E. Smythe Canada
Hans‐Johann Glock Switzerland
Rick van Baaren Netherlands
Martin Lang Czechia
Willie van Peer Germany
Alex Black Canada
Dieuwke De Goede Netherlands
Wouter Wolf United States
James Carney relative to Lisa Zunshine United States Lisa Zunshine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lisa Zunshine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Carney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Carney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Carney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Carney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Carney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Carney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Carney. The network helps show where James Carney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside James Carney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Carney Line = papers co-authored together James Carney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019196
2 201594
3 201656
4 202029
5
Studies in Irish literature and history
195528
6 201526
7 201424
8 201517
9 202016
10 20229
11 20239
12
Celtic studies : essays in memory of Angus Matheson, 1912-1962
19688
13 20178
14 20168
15 20146
16 20185
17
Medieval Irish lyrics
19675
18 20194
19 20193
20 20173

About James Carney

James Carney is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (7 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (228 citations), Social Psychology (192 citations), Classics (28 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (60 citations). James Carney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Dermot Lynott, Marc Brysbaert, James Brand, Louise Connell, Robin Dunbar, Tamás Dávid-Barrett, Rafael Wlodarski, Jacques Launay, Eiluned Pearce and Anna Rotkirch. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, Religion Brain & Behavior, Cognitive Science and Semiotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact