Anna Rotkirch

3.4k citations
94 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Rotkirch

90 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Anna Rotkirch
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Gender Studies 543
  • Demography 595
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 420
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 33
  • Sociology and Political Science 842
Replace Geneviève Bouchard with:
Geneviève Bouchard Canada
Ann Weatherall New Zealand
Deborah Freedman United States
Jean E. Veevers Canada
Paul C. Glick United States
Jetse Sprey United States
Melissa A. Curran United States
Eva Feder Kittay United States
Aliya Saperstein United States
Robert M. Milardo United States
Anna Rotkirch relative to Geneviève Bouchard Canada Geneviève Bouchard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Geneviève Bouchard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Rotkirch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Rotkirch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Rotkirch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Rotkirch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Rotkirch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Rotkirch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Rotkirch. The network helps show where Anna Rotkirch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Rotkirch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Rotkirch Line = papers co-authored together Anna Rotkirch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201594
2 201190
3 201887
4 200073
5 201271
6 201167
7 201064
8 201659
9 201053
10 201644
11 201444
12 201443
13 201442
14 201540
15 201639
16 201333
17 200732
18 202229
19 201129
20 202229

About Anna Rotkirch

Anna Rotkirch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Gender Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (31 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (24 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (21 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (21 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (543 citations), Demography (595 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (420 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (33 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (842 citations). Anna Rotkirch has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Markus Jokela, Antti O. Tanskanen, Mirkka Danielsbacka, Ann Buchanan, Virpi Lummaa, Tamás Dávid-Barrett, Venla Berg, Stuart Gietel‐Basten, Jenni E. Pettay and Anneli Miettinen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Evolutionary Psychology, Evolution and Human Behavior, Behavioral Ecology and Acta Sociologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact