Religion Brain & Behavior

487 papers and 3.4k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 487 papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior usually cover Sociology and Political Science (291 papers), Health (211 papers) and Social Psychology (176 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (208 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (159 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Religion Brain & Behavior are Joseph Bulbulia, Dimitris Xygalatas, Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Wesley J. Wildman, Michiel van Elk, Dominic Johnson, Marc Malmdorf Andersen, Ara Norenzayan, Richard Sosis and Lluís Oviedo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior.

Countries where authors publish in Religion Brain & Behavior

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Religion Brain & Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Religion Brain & Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Religion Brain & Behavior more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026