James Bishop

29 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

James Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Food Science 202
  • Soil Science 57
  • Plant Science 208
  • Immunology 60
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 21
Replace Alessandro Sorrentino with:
Alessandro Sorrentino Italy
Vikas Dua India
Jiawen Zheng China
Richard Carew Canada
Thomas Oppermann
Aurup Ratan Dhar Bangladesh
Jorge Sellare Germany
Minou Yussefi-Menzler
Tian Xia United States
James Bishop relative to Alessandro Sorrentino Italy Alessandro Sorrentino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Alessandro Sorrentino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Bishop. The network helps show where James Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside James Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Bishop Line = papers co-authored together James Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199675
2 196452
3 196241
4 198336
5 197832
6 197427
7 198325
8 196325
9 196819
10
Insights into Low Wage Growth in Australia
201716
11 201116
12 195916
13 197215
14
The Resources Boom and the Australian Economy: A Sectoral Analysis
201314
15 196214
16 19719
17 20096
18 19595
19
Potato quality lowered in field tests with high nitrogen fertilization.
19604
20 19614

About James Bishop

James Bishop is a scholar working on Food Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science and General Health Professions, having authored 32 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Potato Plant Research (16 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers), Economic, financial, and policy analysis (2 papers) and Phosphorus and nutrient management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (202 citations), Soil Science (57 citations), Plant Science (208 citations), Immunology (60 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (21 citations). James Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include H. Timm, D. W. Grimes, O. A. Lorenz, K. B. Tyler, F. E. Broadbent, Amy Chadburn, A. R. Weinhold, John Mascarenhas, John W. Oswald and David L. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Potato Research, Blood, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Economic Record and California Agriculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact